Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by throwwwll 22 days ago
> would not prove that they are deliberately slowing older phones

> Hanlon's (maybe Occam's, too?) Razor applies

peak "Leave the multi-trillion corporation alone"

1 comments

I'm not saying that they definitely did not do it on purpose, it's possible, I am saying that a simple with/without updates check doesn't prove they did it on purpose.

In my own experience, newer products get more love automatically, because the testers, the devs, the team are on newer devices. Perf regressions are also harder to catch than simpler bugs and sometimes require extended usage to notice smaller perf degradation, and devs and QA do not really test like that (often enough).

The way I see it, older products will naturally decline with updates, as they are less of a focus while validating a new release. Sure, they get some "freebie" improvements, but I'm guessing the accidental "decay" outweighs any improvements.

I'm not saying they couldn't make it on purpose. I'm saying that (IMO) it's more likely that it gets worse with every update even without malicious, conniving people trying to get you to upgrade by worsening your OS.

I do say they did it on purpose. And they did. Thank you for attention to this matter.