[jasongullickson]

We'll be taking this for a spin. I've been pushing for an API-driven site for awhile but the case for that model was cinched when we started adding non-web clients to our system.

A leaned-out Rails is a nice compliment to other bolt-on API options and fat GUI-based API builders. Personally I prefer to start with something even simpler, but the facts are you can cover more ground faster (and potentially safer) with something like this vs. building your HTTP stack from scratch.

The Hypermedia stuff is most exciting to me, as hand-rolling that is a hard-sell for many teams (if you have a system of any significant richness).

[steveklabnik2]

Awesome. Let me know how it goes, please. :)

> The Hypermedia stuff is most exciting to me,

Me too. There's nothing concrete here yet, but there's lots of space to explore and good things to build. I really want us to be a leader in this space.

[grabastic]

I'm very excited about this as well. Any hints about what's on the roadmap?

Would love to see easy versioning with custom mime types and link headers for pagination and associated resources. Maybe that doesn't belong in core... but it would still be pretty cool.

[bploetz]

My testing shows that versionist works just fine with rails-api apps to provide versioning capabilities. If you run into any problems, please file an issue.

https://github.com/bploetz/versionist

[grabastic]

thanks. i'll give it a try... it wasn't on my radar. :)

[steveklabnik]

Nothing specific so far. AMS should know how to put out some kind of hypermedia-enabled type. We want to build a bunch of apps and then pull an implementation out, not imagine what we think would be good and then try to build apps with it.