|
|
|
|
|
|
by bigger_fish
23 days ago
|
|
|
To your first point, yes, I agree. I would continue the thought that many of them are irritated with it and would rather not see it at all. To the second point, that's the idea behind the adjustable threshold. It is indeed hard to distinguish; the extension will miss some gen-AI writing and return false-positives on some human writing. The user gets to decide which side to err toward. It will never be infallible because the writing won't have C2PA metadata attached to it the way media does. It's just a tool that is a whole lot better than nothing for people who don't want to waste their time reading something written by a robot, or hate the inhuman homogeneity of "AI style." Don't you ever find yourself thinking "nobody talks like this?" |
|
|