[impulser_]

I think the opposite. It allows more people to be creative. Similar to how the DAW allowed more people to become musicians. You can produce a hit song with just a laptop now.

Now you can have people producing videos without needing a crew of people.

[jplusequalt]

>I think the opposite. It allows more people to be creative.

Why are you assuming that a majority of people don't already have the means to make videos? Many people have access to a phone, laptop, and stable internet connection. What else do they really need? What's stopping them from using their phones to shoot home movies, making animations with MS Paint, recording themselves talking about a subject they're genuinely interested in, etc.?

>Now you can have people producing videos without needing a crew of people.

This is conflating production values with creativity. Mr. Beast's videos cost millions of dollars to film and produce, yet they're creatively bankrupt.

[LetsGetTechnicl]

You never needed a crew of people to make videos. This is just outsourcing people's creativity.

[criddell]

The potential for harm is so much greater with video than creating an mp3. You can stoke hate and fear so easily.

[bethekidyouwant]

Or the opposite? all tools are dangerous…

[baq]

The method in the madness is to generate so much on demand slop no one will accidentally find your hate and FUD content anyway.

[criddell]

It will be found because our politicians will share it.