| > There is probably a name for something in the middle of that spectrum Well if there isn't one then we can make one, similar to how Luddite as a word came through this according to wikipedia: > The Luddites were members of a 19th-century movement of English textile workers who opposed the use of certain types of automated machinery due to concerns relating to worker pay and output quality. They often destroyed the machines in organised raids.[1][2] Members of the group referred to themselves as Luddites, self-described followers of "Ned Ludd", a legendary weaver whose name was used as a pseudonym in threatening letters to mill owners and government officials.[3] The question arises as to who is the Ned Ludd of the modern era of AI/LLM who represent what you are talking about in the sense of pragmatism, logic,common sense and balance. > Just because new tech is launched and may be temporarily popular does not mean it should be praised, adored or even accepted Agreed, not all that glitters is gold. Edit: speaking of the question arises part, I think that I personally liked Mitchell's view of AI, he is a bit too optimistic at times but I find his overall opinion balanced and more nuanced, so perhaps mitchellism or hashimotoism/hashimotism could be one of my votes. |
not all that glitters is gold
One of my favorite proverbs along with not all that wander are lost. There must be a word that has more of a well balanced individual connotation.
[1] - https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/hashimotos-di...
[2] - https://www.reddit.com/r/Mitchellism/