Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by adenta 31 days ago
At first usage I'm not impressed. I've probably spent a couple grand on Seedance 2 to date, and I can't find anything google omni flash does better than Seedance from running a handful of samples through the system. You can find some of the videos I've made in my HN bio link.
3 comments

Just curious - are you at all concerned about the legal implications of ai-generating property listing videos?
The legal risk probably lies solely with those who are selling the properties. They are responsible if the video misrepresents anything.
yeah, it's all about keeping everything grounded in reality.
But it looks so fake that I wouldn't waste time visiting a property advertised like that.
Agreed, the author surely must see and know this?
I agree, looks pretty terrible...
You are misleading people. I think this is disgraceful.

Please grow a spine.

Seedance 2 is amazing, compared with anything else American tech is producing. It does struggle with consistency like all other models.

The other problem is Seedance is heavily censored because of copyright concerns.

  > The other problem is Seedance is heavily censored because of copyright concerns.
Instead of censoring, wouldn't it make sense to simply not train on copyrighted materials?
The problem isn’t training data, it’s reference locking and allowing anyone to make whatever content they want.
What is reference locking?

  > allowing anyone to make whatever content they want.
One could draw a Mickey Mouse three-disc logo in inkscape, but nobody would sue inkscape because the application did not know what was being created. Likewise, asking for e.g. "a black disc, with two smaller discs tangent to it at a 105 degree angle" would not be infringing if the model never saw the Mickey Mouse logo to begin with.
I have exactly the same thought. Anyone who had used seedance 2.0 a bit can tell Gemini is a bit behind, and seedance 2.1 is on the horizontal already.