|
It does not work, it's a slop, with a bunch of other sloppers that send PRs with bugfixes for a project they don't even use. This is actually hilarious, 60k of starts for a project that even the author could not RUN, not even test. This garbage won't fit on ESP32 (the only supported platform). Just look at one of the comments from j04chim on Github: This project IS an "elaborate hoax".
The "WiFi CSI sensing survey (IEEE, 2019)" reference is actually called "Effects of Video Encoding on Camera-Based Heart Rate Estimation" and is about, well, video encoding.
"WiPose: Human pose estimation with WiFi (ACM, 2020)" is actually called "Exploring LoRa for Long-range Through-wall Sensing" and is not about "pose estimation", but if you follow this paper you could indeed sense human activities through walls. Its explain that LoRa can sense farther than Wi-Fi. If you had really read that paper, you would probably have used LoRa instead of Wi-Fi.
"DensePose from WiFi (Carnegie Mellon, 2022)" is the real name of the paper but only show that you can estimate human poses with Wi-Fi and CSI with somewhat good confidence, and the paper compare the idea to image-based pose estimation. So... Not a lot of "through walls vision" going on there.
These three papers alone you present as "references" shows that you project demonstrate impossible capacities and you AI(s) seems to have mixed the second and the third papers to create this non-sense.
If you discovered some new capacities, unexplored by DensePose and forgotten by LoRa Sensing which allow such a high degree of confidence, maybe you should present your discoveries to the scientific community.
Lastly, on the "scientific" part, Channel state information, also known as CSI is not a mysterious technology available only on a few shady Wi-Fi chips. It is, as written in the DensePose paper "the ratio between the transmitted signal wave and
the received signal wave".
On the "Github repo" part, your project is badly organised. You seem to rely on AI for the organisation of the files/folders, which shows. The code is badly organised, and, as someone pointed out in a previous issues, the tests are non-sense (in fact, they are not even tests).
Your Readme is a freaking book, the documentation misleading and finally, which is I think why most people are sceptical about your project, you never present any real use of your program in real life, with the results it gives in real condition and real terrain. Yeah, your AI generated fake values for your fake AI generated tests looks shiny and all, but, have you even tested your product ?? You have an API, auth system, docker, and all and it's supposed to work on an ESP32 ?? How are you supposed to even flash your program on the ESP ?? With the power of love and friendship ? The ROM of this micro-controller is so smol you could not even fit 1% of your code on it. (the README is badly organised, I followed the "table of content" but the AI putted the ESP building process above everything and never mentioned it after, the code for the ESP is anyway, from my point of view, bad, and I don't understand why you would need FreeRTOS for something like that)
Maybe I'm wrong and I'm just a sceptical moron, but, to me you don't seem really knowledgeable on the topic of IT, as you don't even seem to be able to correctly cite a reference or to search on the internet for what "CSI" is. You just sell overpriced AI formations to desperate people and I think this repo is just an ad campaign for that, as most of your other projects.
If you truly believe this project and code is fully functional and could save life (as you seem (or your AI seem) to present it this way), you are either way smarter than me (I'm not really smart, it's not really hard) or really delusional. And I'd gladly be the wrong and stupid one.
And I could also talk about the fake Discord invite link, the fake support e-mail (I checked, there is no TXT or dkim records registered for this domain name, so there is no e-mail servers configured, or at least correctly configured) at the bottom of the README file, but, well... I guess you got the picture.
|