[Philip-J-Fry]

I have tried Claude code. It doesn't look like that!

I don't know what the project is. All I see is a TUI that looks completely broken.

Go and use Claude Code right now. Does it look like that? Random underscores all over the page. No it doesn't.

[walthamstow]

It can look like that in certain conditions. The question is why are you so eager to give critique on unrelated work, appearing in a demo screencap, to someone who didn't produce it?

[Philip-J-Fry]

I don't know what you're talking about.

His tool wraps Claude and breaks the TUI. What's so hard to understand?

That's valid critique. What world have I woke up in today?

[walthamstow]

To be honest I assumed it was the screencap software running a basic terminal env without bells and whistles that CC needs, which I've seen before. If the actual tool functions like that too, that's not great. That said, it works for them, it works for them.

[gilrain]

But earlier:

> The question is why are you so eager to give critique on unrelated work, appearing in a demo screencap, to someone who didn't produce it?

I guess the question was actually, why were you so eager to critique a critique based on a false assumption?

I wish people would be careful what they support with their rhetoric.

[albedoa]

> The question is why are you so eager to give critique on unrelated work

That is not the question. The topic of discussion had been defined multiple times before you commented!