|
|
|
|
|
|
by chadgpt3
33 days ago
|
|
|
People tend to think there's a demand for a Twitter-like platform, so if they make a new Twitter-like platform they can compete with it. There isn't. There's demand for Twitter, specifically. Just like you wouldn't "switch" from HN to a hypothetical clone site, people don't switch from Twitter to Blue Sky. Blue Sky and Fediverse are separate platforms with separate identities and cultures and their surface resemblance to Twitter doesn't really mean anything. Twitter could be just as well "replaced" by anything else from Usenet to SMF to a literal megaphone. |
|
|