|
|
|
|
|
by keepamovin
27 days ago
|
|
Well I also think the docs need a rewrite, but that's because my time is going elsewhere. In truth, I'm probably not "qualified" to write a programming language, but I'm doingg so anyway. I use LLMs (20 - 40/month plans) to implement, so do use 100% of my effort for this on design, model, and goals. JS is most familiar to me and lets me work instantly. I know precisely what I want this to be, but I'm also open to its uses blossoming unexpectedly. I'm building because I want this thing to exist, and bc it also v fun. If it offended your sensibilities or you're look for a trad built, ultra-optimized C++-like compiler/chain on day one, you do miss the point a bit, and it prolly ain't for you, bud. lol |
|
That said, two things: I use LLMs for coding a lot, and I'm not turning my nose at the use of LLMs here, though I do think the user-facing pages/documentation could use more direct, human-written language.
The other is I do think this is probably something I'd be interested in. I "maintain" a few modified compiler stacks for worth, using Nim to:
- generate libc-less, pure syscall binaries with minimal ELF/PE headers
- generate Cosmopolitan-libc binaries for all platforms
- cross-compile via Zig/LLVM for those platforms
It seems like there is some cool work here, I just think it could be expressed a bit more cleanly and directly on the front-page/docs.