[watwut]

> Back when Musk proposed buying Twitter, the site already was in the gutters, there's a reason that place was up for sale. Bugs littered everywhere, reliability issues, the disaster that was the universally hated 2019 redesign, sex spam bots, trolls and propaganda farms running the show

Frankly, bullshit. It worked reliably, extremely so. It had remarkably few bugs too. It was also actually doing way better financially. It was not perfect ... but all the issues you claim it had became massively more worst.

Musk bought it for political reasons, to stomp down on left leaning opposition and networks that were well functioning there. That part was a success, it is a nazi site now and helped Trump win elections.

[mschuster91]

> Frankly, bullshit. It worked reliably, extremely so. It had remarkably few bugs too. It was also actually doing way better financially. It was not perfect ... but all the issues you claim it had became massively more worst.

I did not claim that Musk improved on the issues, quite the contrary. It seems many people did not read the very last sentence. I also wrote:

> People actually hoped that Musk would turn the sinking ship around.

Quite obviously I am referring to what was the situation back in 2022. Past tense.

[lmm]

> Frankly, bullshit. It worked reliably, extremely so. It had remarkably few bugs too. It was also actually doing way better financially.

It was still notoriously prone to failure, and it had been a financial disaster area until the Trump phenomenon suddenly boosted it.