|
|
|
|
|
by jdiaz5513
27 days ago
|
|
Fully agree, and I am mildly disappointed to see nobody has brought up Maturana and Varela in this entire thread. The deeper layer is autopoiesis - the conceptual foundation authored by them that embodied/4E cognition builds on. They defined cognition as a necessary property of self-referencing, self-maintaining boundaries in an information-theoretic/topological sense, not bound to any specific physical process. This dissolves the dualism Rovelli targets in a way that pure materialist/eliminativist arguments don’t manage cleanly. Autopoiesis is fully physical (mathematically modelable, biologically grounded) but it locates consciousness in structural relationships and informational dynamics rather than a purely physical substrate. Thompson’s Mind in Life (2007) is the contemporary version, and Varela’s later work integrates phenomenology directly. I hold that it may be possible to use the toolkits of set/category/group/type theory to formalize these relationships. Would be a vastly different conversation thread here if this work was more well known. |
|