|
|
|
|
|
|
by plaidfuji
26 days ago
|
|
|
If I’m understanding this correctly, it starts by raising this question, then argues that it’s kind of a cheap and meaningless punch-down. I’m not sure I completely agree.. I think these types of questions are more a response to the level of hype around LLMs and less about knocking people down. You see a lot of people excited about the personal productivity app they vibe-coded (which IMO is totally legit - it’s cool that run-of-the-mill apps that used to require a professional developer are now available more on demand), and yet it’s hard to think of a new piece of high-impact traditional software that has come out since the release of ChatGPT. But it’s also hard to think of the most recent piece of important traditional software that came out… at all. I couldn’t even name the most recent Photoshop-like release. Ableton / Fruityloops? Tableau? Big pro-sumer apps kind of plateaued in the early 00s. LLMs have made it easier to develop software, but at the same time they’ve also raised the bar of what’s worth writing software to do. Many things that used to be apps are now just prompts. Maybe ChatGPT was the next Photoshop - it turned writing basic apps from a profession into a hobby. Anyway. Good post - definitely not written by an LLM, and that’s a good thing. |
|
|
You're not.
> it starts by raising this question, then argues that it’s kind of a cheap and meaningless punch-down.
The cheap and meaningless punch-down in the article is the vibecoding accusation. The question in the title is actually their main line of attack against that accusation, all the way to the end.
>> QED So. Where are the vibecoded Photoshops? WHERE IS THE THREAT YOU MADE UP TO ATTACK ME?
>>I'm waiting.
I find it hilarious that so many people are finding it so difficult to grasp even the general line of argument of the article despite trying earnestly.