|
|
|
|
|
by wlkr
28 days ago
|
|
I didn't say it was necessarily more credible, although I understand that was mentioned further up. Personally I found the article (not the tweets) much more useful to understand the context of all this, as someone very out of the loop. Certianly more useful to me than a long list of very specific, in my option largely LLM output, points about a codebase I'm entirely unfamiliar with with claims that seem to need a legal team and court case to be meaningful. Slop is somewhat unfair and I'm happy to be disagreed with. |
|