|
|
|
|
|
by n4r9
32 days ago
|
|
Thanks for the reference, that looks like a pretty thorough review. It seems to me that Chalmers already precludes the possibility of physical/materialist explanations with his claim, quoted in the first section: > There is a logically possible world physically identical to ours, in which the positive facts about consciousness in our world do not hold. This certainly doesn't feel obvious or intuitive to me. I would expect that someone with the same neuronal make-up will have the same experience. |
|
In my regard the weak link is our understanding of materialism. It is to simple minded. (though panpsychism sounds really crank)