|
|
|
|
|
|
by rob_c
37 days ago
|
|
|
_sigh_ 2020, 2021.... I'm talking about clearly 2023 onwards once it was crystal clear to everyone fluent in actual stats what the risks were. Again, give me the ~15million bodies we expect to see dead in India for a 1% fatality vs the ~100k that is a -serious- discrepancy from a nation that hasn't mastered other hygiene issues yet at a national level. And I'm supposed to believe they magically conquered cv19 better than the crazed lockdown nations of the west? simply voting against brexit helped save gran remember: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3955345 Oh please don't give me the "le multiple studies in bio" argument. By that logic magic mushrooms and witchcraft are far more reliable due to 'working' for centuries. The field is full of reproducibility crises and follow the leader herd mentality, chemistry, even bio-informatics maybe, but bio as a whole, eesh... Collecting the data in controlled conditions is exactly my point, you're trying to infer to a whole general populous on something that became insanely politically charged. Given the complete absence of admitting this or even trying to factor this into studies makes the whole thing a stack of cards. |
|
|
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12615008/
>_sigh_ 2020, 2021.... I'm talking about clearly 2023 onwards
Oh, yeah, the IFR after almost everyone was either infected, vaccinated or both. Great job here, champion of stats and "proper" biology.