[imtringued]

Every single comment you've posted was unhelpful and demeaning and you've constantly had to backtrack every single time you've had to respond. This is extremely poor form and I see zero goodwill here.

ainch doesn't care about the inference engine knowing the shapes. This is obvious. He has been talking about developer ergonomics and you've basically said "only idiots don't know where the ergonomics features are", while linking to a file which explicitly states that it is a experimental/private API that is only needed in niche situations which is basically doubling down on having poor ergonomics.

If you can't understand the problem as a developer working on those features and you had to link to the source you've written rather than the docs, you're basically admitting that you're the problem.

[mathisfun123]

This is the whiniest response I've ever seen on hn. Congrats.

> you had to link to the source you've written rather than the docs, you're basically admitting that you're the problem.

God forbid i expect people using complex tools to know how they actually work.

Edit: there are two categories of devs out there - those that expect code to be a fully perfected product delivered to them on a silver platter (only requiring docs, which must be perfect btw), and those which understand all code is merely a suggestion. For the latter a code pointer is more than enough. I leave you to infer which are more productive.