Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by elzbardico 31 days ago
But here the space also have the role of serving as a crumple zone in case of frontal collisions
1 comments

If you can put something in it it doesn't count as crumple zone and the car has to be engineered with a separate crumple zone anyway.
Collapsing trunks have been a thing since the 90s.

There's no regulatory requirement for crumple zones. There's regulatory requirements for performance. The cheapest/easiest way to meet these is crumple zones.

Your luggage and golf clubs aren't gonna do squat in a collision. The regulators don't care that about the one in a million chance that someone gets into an accident a) where crumple zones matter b) while hauling objects so solid they don't just round to "no effect" because they have bigger fish to fry and if you create a "standard loading" for the test the OEMs will simply design to that and basically create a bunch of work and expense for marginal benefit.

Yeah, but not many people have the habit of hauling solid I-beams of steel in their "frunks".

I don't really believe the average groceries load will add that much rigidity to this space as deny its function as a crumple zone.