|
|
|
|
|
by anotherhue
4952 days ago
|
|
It's a good read, and one of my starting points, but I had already seen some official archival material that contradicted several of the article's claims. There aren't too many references given that can be chased down either. |
|
There may be an old ham out there who remembers why 2.4GHz was reserved for ISM use.
edit: fixed typo, thanks lutusp