|
|
|
|
|
|
by coderintherye
27 days ago
|
|
|
"Proof of Attendance" has long been worked on in the crypto space, basically giving digital badges to people based on verifiable attendance. The problem in that space and in supply chains is at the end of the day you still have to eventually trust some thing as the source of truth to verify against. I've done supply chain verification in as simple of a way of comparing the downstream ERP to the upstream (e.g. Brand or Wholesaler) data, but it relies on access to the upstream data and trust that the upstream data is correct. You can reverse the problem by thinking about who has the incentive to try to game the state of the data in the system and what are the most common paths they are going to choose to do so. |
|
|
But, What if we give them accountability that data attribution is their accountability call who is entering there. And Like handshake policy if we implement their and multiparty are contributing there like logistics providers, clicks the movement of goods and delivers, they already do in their system but if we can connect them in the same infrastructure.
And why should be data so corrected? Why we should not improve the workflow, like ERPs already have save draft and submit feature and also many software's and reporting tools have the delegation supports.
And today the provenance and traceability platforms are doing just upper things from brands call but not looking from suppliers POV.
Also, you said right, "has the incentive to try to game", so today as traceability and provenance are being done as reporting tools, why it so what's the truth source for that? What you think?
Why we can't exploit that? What you think?