| Trashing without offering a hands down solution is academic and therefore can safely be rejected. Please show me only ten of the SaaS you lead that rely on your CSS framework. You must have one, because you talk about structure and premises. Orderly put and repeatedly applied you get a framework. I doubt it. I registered my first domain 1997. I love to debate anyone coming up with a clever not so clever theoretical argument against Tailwind. Where are all the you might not need jQuery JavaScript guys? The same goes for Tailwind. And just as a reminder: CSS started as so called separation of markup and design. A zen garden tried to proof this but only showed how one cannot exist without the other. Loose coupling as the saying goes. Since the ACID test CSS went from some proposals to a stunning black hole of finally receiving differential treatment with the level nomenclature. And you besides all incompatibility issues and different browsers still think that you really grasp CSS or even know how to apply it semantically correct even though by matter of fact many concepts feature bogus terminology due to compatibility issues? I would love to interview you regarding edge cases. Do you get box models? Collapsing markings? Floats? Clearfix? Order of application? Print layouts? Views vs fluid design? Really, attacking Tailwind is the same as “Let’s build our own Google” trope. It shows lack of competence. |
Given your attitude (see your last sentence for a prime example), why would anyone want to debate you?