|
|
|
|
|
by kennywinker
34 days ago
|
|
> it should be obviously true that 10 dumber models running 10x as fast != 1 smarter model If a smaller model tries ten things and comes to the same conclusion as the big model gets first try, then yeah 10x small = 1x big. Is that where we are at now? Idk probably not - but it’s not hard to imagine something like that emerging soon. There is already evidence that smaller models get some things _better_ than bigger models (e.g. https://aisle.com/blog/ai-cybersecurity-after-mythos-the-jag... ) > There’s also the assumption you’re making that a 10x smaller model is 10x dumber when it’s not That is not an assumption i am making. I said “a smaller model” not “a 10x smaller model”. Model speed and model “intelligence” are both non-linear. |
|