[pie_flavor]

Thank you for repeating yourself in exactly the way I was criticizing without really reading the criticisms. So, once more with feeling: Radicle does not offer the Cargo crate registry protocol. Radicle does not offer anything to do with crate hosting that a generic Git remote doesn't. If you want a crate repository like crates.io, you do not want Radicle. The best crate repository software is Cloudflare's Freighter, but if you were to implement some sort of distributed version, that's also an option, but it wouldn't be called Radicle. If you just want the Git support that Radicle offers, you can do so just fine without Radicle; it is generic Git remote support, and you can declare Git dependencies in Cargo.toml from Sourcehut or Codeberg or whatever. Radicle is a product that puts issue/PR tracking on top of Git. It does not have anything to do with what separates git dependencies from crates.io dependencies, it does not have anything to do with automatically mirroring existing hosts, it does not offer anything to the git dependency experience, and it does not offer anything to the registry dependency experience.

> Crates.io has not moved away from Github-only authentication, and got into the habit of yelling at people who complained about it.

This was me updating you on the present state of the world. Replying with the previous state of the world, as though this is somehow new and better information, without even looking up whether it was still true, is a level of deliberate ignorance I can't fathom displaying on purpose. Again: crates.io is presently in the process of moving away from GitHub-only authentication.