| >that is not how the LLM systems currently work (per vendors descriptions) Anthropic says of the their model[0]: """Claude sometimes thinks in a conceptual space that is shared between languages, suggesting it has a kind of universal “language of thought.” {...} Claude will plan what it will say many words ahead, and write to get to that destination. We show this in the realm of poetry, where it thinks of possible rhyming words in advance and writes the next line to get there. This is powerful evidence that even though models are trained to output one word at a time, they may think on much longer horizons to do so.""" Anthropic also created 'golden gate claude'[1] by identifying the region of its architecture that corresponded to the concept of the golden gate bridge and activating it. What would such a region exist for if claude could only think one token at a time? >the execution of our reasoning and thought processes is not obviously similar to LLM's "Not obviously similar" I can agree with. I don't think you've identified a way in which they are obviously different, though. [0] https://www.anthropic.com/research/tracing-thoughts-language... [1] https://www.anthropic.com/news/golden-gate-claude |