[kavok]

The example you give doesn’t really track. If a drug dealer is outside the entrance of your home it’s completely unavoidable. A kid looking at adult material online? Entirely within the control of the parents. We already have filtering and monitoring software.

I know several parents that limit screen time, require screen usage be restricted to public areas of the home, have parental controls and filtering operating etc.. some of the parents I know won’t even let their kids watch a movie unless they screen it first.

[pocksuppet]

If a drug dealer is outside the entrance of your home you can avoid it by not leaving your home. What if every time you turn on the computer it shows objectionable content? It's easily avoidable by not turning on the computer. Same argument. Is it a reasonable one?

[kavok]

Something must be wrong with your computer. I don't see objectionable content when I turn mine on? I'd have to actively seek out objectionable content and I don't even have any sort of filtering or parental controls enabled on my own devices.

[pocksuppet]

I do, it asks me to log in with a Microsoft account and thereby give all my personal data to Microsoft.

Actually not, since I use Linux, but most people's do. It's much worse on my phone.

[notrealyme123]

The drug dealer is a potential very bad decision in the making. And a potentially very interesting one for a young person.

The internet can also contain potentially very bad decisions.

I don't want to argue to block the internet, but it is just not black and white.