|
|
|
|
|
|
by secondcoming
28 days ago
|
|
|
I'm not sure what the argument is here? These are in the standard library because someone proposed their inclusion. They're fine for the majority of people who really don't want to roll their own data structures each time. They're not compulsory to use, you're still free to roll your own. |
|
|
That std::hive will fit right in. Another container type you probably shouldn't use, draining precious maintenance resource from groups who have better things they could be doing.
> These are in the standard library because someone proposed their inclusion.
As with std::hive. Indeed the "unordered" containers, just like std::hive were repeatedly knocked back and eventually got in decades after they were obsolete. Persistence really does pay off in C++
> They're fine for the majority of people who really don't want to roll their own data structures each time.
Sure, doubtless std::hive is fine for that same majority of people.