|
|
|
|
|
|
by embedding-shape
27 days ago
|
|
|
> Not perfect, but I think as good evidence as any It really isn't, I just tried a random one of my own HN comments, very much 100% human and it reported "100% of this text is AI Generated". Tools that give false-positives aren't just "not perfect", they're actively harmful and not "as good evidence as any". Stop relying on those tools to give you any sort of direction or indication what so ever, they simply do not work. Edit: Lol, just noticed Pangram also provides "evidence" for their rating, your link says it's 100% written by AI because there is 16 instances found of the Em Dash, that's it, those are all the evidence for the very confident "100% AI" score they gave... Yay science! |
|
|