|
|
|
|
|
by aleksiy123
35 days ago
|
|
that’s exactly the part that is anti locality of behaviour. I don’t want/need cascade. I only care about components and building up from them. And I would rather have it be explicit over implicit and scoped/encapsulated. Call it composition over cascade. To be clear I think it’s possible to do this without tailwind. And tailwind has other out of the box features/opinions. But it works well enough without too much friction. |
|
It is not. Because it fits the concept of "web pages" as documents and forms (which most web apps are, even if they're trying to pass as desktop applications.
> I don’t want/need cascade. I only care about components and building up from them. And I would rather have it be explicit over implicit and scoped/encapsulated.
And you're very welcome to do what you want. But there's no need to bash cascading as it's a good solution for web pages.