|
|
|
|
|
by mrandish
31 days ago
|
|
We probably don't disagree on much but nuanced details, which is why I said it was a "strange claim" instead of "incorrect". Being a retro-head who lived through those days obsessively watching every twist and turn... with "strange claim" I was trying to convey it's a "commercial success" is a nuanced judgement on which reasonable people can disagree and any such absolute claims require clear definition of terms, scopes and time frames. |
|
(The Mac press back then loved to portray Jobs as some insane cocaine addict, and local gossip backed that up. Probably not in his biographies, but that would get you fired.)