[flossly]

You call it lazy. I call it "focus" or avoiding pre-mature optimization.

I find the "legal liability" claim hilarious... I do better than 95% of the web: as I said I HAVE some screen reader directives (just did not test it), and labels to make the app more accessible.

[48terry]

> You call it lazy. I call it "focus"

Is this to be read that disabled people and their needs, or more directly from the replied-to comment, "doing the right thing", are not a focus of yours, flossly?

[LtWorf]

A former coworker of mine opened a meeting saying "we are so good, we care about accessibility". I had been complaining for months and finally a customer had said "we won't buy your product unless it complies to the law".

[DANmode]

Perhaps an accessible URL you’re associated with in your bio, to bolster your point?

[reaperducer]

I find the "legal liability" claim hilarious

You must have six million dollars laying around. Because that's the penalty Target paid for not having an accessible web site.

[_puk]

In 2008..

That wasn't even a regulatory penalty, but a class action by the National Federation of the blind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Federation_of_the_Bli...