Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by thrownthatway 29 days ago
> a small number of people. Around 1500 in a country of 9 million.

What is this supposed to mean?

That’s a completely nonsense statement to make because you’ve provided no data on problem opioid use in Switzerland.

Is 1500 a lot? Not many? Average? Should all nine million be on the program?

1 comments

I'd say it is about what you expect for a country with voluntary programs. In the Netherlands the original program like the Swiss, resulted in heroïne becoming a medication for heavily addicted people usable under supervision. In the Netherlands there are about 4000 people with medical prescriptions for heroine on a 18M population.

Note that it is free, supervised and voluntary so ymmv in other countries. The conclusions of the original program with methadone in the 80s was that it resulted in hardly any reduction amongst heavy and problematic users and they were likely to go back to using heroine with all the associated problems, the heroine distribution program worked but needed some tweaking, thus the program was fully legalised and put into law resulting in supervised consumption (at the distribution point) with dosage control and medical checkups and far less issues.

I’ve used heroin maybe 80 times.

I can understand why methadone is ineffective as a treatment.

Wow. Can you speak more about this experience?
Something like 25% of people who “try it once” will go on to be problem users. So don’t.

I had to call an ambulance for one friend cos he stopped breathing in front of me.

I woke up on my kitchen floor 45 minutes after a shot. I had time to cap the needle before I passed out and had no idea I was about to go down.

Another mate died because she used at home alone while her partner was at work.

Other than that, it’s a pretty nice high :)