|
|
|
|
|
by CSMastermind
37 days ago
|
|
This seems tautological, but in practice, you might expect to see different results. Engineering hours are finite, so if they're spread across interpreting signals from two different sources, they might not go deep enough to make either one as good as it could be. Having your engineering resources more focused on a particular approach might actually yield better results. I say this as someone who's dealing with LiDAR + vision vs pure vision in a different domain, and at this point, I actually think our pure vision systems are better. |
|
For very complex things like AVs, it is critically important to keep the number of such variables down, since each acts on complexity & workload not as an addition but more like a quadratic, or worse—combinatorial explosion.