Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mikae1 33 days ago
In my experience, what you call vision-based systems don't even come close to Gyroflow. After I started using Gyroflow I haven't touched the Ronin gimbal many times.
1 comments

A physical stabilizer like the Ronin is not what they mean. They mean vision based approaches which should be more accurate.
It doesn’t seem obvious that vision based stabilisation would be more accurate than a high accuracy gyroscope of the actual motion.

At any rate if gyroflow obsoletes an actual gimbal it’s pretty close to perfect.