[staticassertion]

> even when the rust-lang/rust repository itself largely forbids vibe coding.

This policy does not seem to forbid vibe coding?

[lifthrasiir]

It does in the narrower sense of vibe coding (as opposed to more general agentic coding, which is also called vibe coding from time to time...).

> Solicited, non-critical, high-quality, well-tested, and well-reviewed code changes that are originally authored by an LLM are allowed, with disclosure.

Vibe coding (in its original meaning) would have hard time arguing it's of high quality.

[staticassertion]

I guess that's the problem with the term. It should likely be left entirely out of a document like this since it's just confusing.

[dgellow]

I read it as a hypothetical