[apparent]

Going to be interesting to see if they adapt their messaging to be more explicit about who their beneficiaries are, or just stop soliciting in CA. Seems like a good chunk of their donations could come from CA, so it'd be a big loss. Maybe they'll instead spin up some CA-based beneficiaries so they can maintain their mission without having to be more explicit about who is benefiting exactly.

[FireBeyond]

Maybe look at PA and OH to see what they did there - since courts in those states have separately ruled in a similar manner.

[EtienneDeLyon]

There are no "beneficiaries" it's a grift!

[apparent]

I think the kids who get to go to camp or Israel for free are beneficiaries. It's not like all of the money goes to executives' salaries, right?