Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wiseowise 36 days ago
The analogy is just bad to begin with.

It's more like "we've switched ingredients while actively denying that they'll be switched".

1 comments

They never denied they'd switch, just that they'd need solid improvements confirmed before they switched. Clearly internally they've decided they've seen the gains necessary to carry on with the switch
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019226

> This whole thread is an overreaction. 302 comments about code that does not work. We haven’t committed to rewriting. There’s a very high chance all this code gets thrown out completely

I know words are hard, but if you find it hard to believe any humans here, then feed it into your favorite LLM.

> I’m curious to see what a working version of this looks, what it feels like, how it performs and if/how hard it’d be to get it to pass Bun’s test suite and be maintainable. I’d like to be able to compare a viable Rust version and a Zig version side by side.

I know reading the second line of your quote is hard...