|
|
|
|
|
by kev009
37 days ago
|
|
Why should an outlaw with virtually unlimited resources be given oversight of money for any purpose whatsoever? Just because he has enough money to avoid consequences and the ability to constantly try to launder tarnished reputation doesn't negate the fact that this is completely optional and unnecessary. Out of however many billions of people on Earth, we can't select people with a clear record to administer public benefit operations? Absurd. |
|