Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stusmith1977 4953 days ago
I vaguely remember there was some discussion of this in 'Metamagical Themas' by Douglas Hofstader. It's been a while since if I read it, but if I remember correctly he drew some parallels between law and provability in maths - basically, you can either have a system of law which cannot cover everything you want to make laws about, or you have a system of law which does, but which has some undecidable laws. Feel free to correct if I've misremembered.
2 comments

You can take it a step further: until we can model human behavior mathematically, a legal system attempting to regulate that human behavior cannot be modeled in a mathematical way.

In other words, by the time we have consistent laws (in the mathematical sense), "Precrime" could already exist.

Very similar to Godel's incompleteness theorem, or perhaps an application of it.