[tlogan]

I am sure that nothing illegal was done here.

But the fact that OpenAI was a nonprofit and then suddenly became a for-profit is definitely something that does not feel right. I am 100% sure that it is all legal and such, but we have this mental model that “nonprofits are the good guys, run by people who just want to help humanity and nothing else.”

But that is not true, and probably never was.

[keeganpoppen]

could not agree with this take more. it feels like a bait and switch, but not the kind that makes me want to take sharpie to cardboard. it’s just… weird. and i don’t even necessarily think it’s “bad”… it’s just a weird unforced error because openai never “had” to be nonprofit, but they chose that path only to abandon it. just strange. and it makes all their internal docs (especially brockman’s diary, which, as an aside: how the fuck did this shit come up in discovery, and what kind of idiot would say the shit he said in a diary that can come up in discovery like this? i know he is a very smart man, which is what makes it extra hilarious.). but yeah even with how “bad” the various quotes look i’m still mostly on the side of this all being a “nothing-burger”…

[Petersipoi]

> I am sure that nothing illegal was done here.

> I am 100% sure that it is all legal and such

Why are you so confident on either of these statements? Seems like such a weird thing to be confident about when we know so little about the deals that went down

[an0malous]

The whole idea of a non profit never made any sense, it’s conflating the idea of profitability with altruism. These are completely independent things.

[danaw]

they're not independent; a 501c3 is both a nonprofit and is meant to serve a public good (altruism).