[Ucalegon]

So we have moved the goalposts to this point.

I am sorry you feel this way, it does not change the facts of whats being discussed, its just that you disagree and you lacked the initial courage or intellectual capabilities to express that constructively, so you had to obfuscate through providing nothing of value to the discussion via low value comments. I get that YOU don't think something, but just because YOU feel something doesn't make it valid, grounded in reason, or should be listened too.

Have a great rest of your day and weekend!

[infecto]

Others pointed it out better but you jumped to a conclusion in 30 seconds pointing out pointed legal and risk asks that don’t apply to the thread. Just look at the other threads of conversation where you go massively downvoted. You can capitalize YOU all you want but my point still stands. Yall are jumping to oddly specific conclusions that don’t matter in this thread. There is an absolutely interesting discussion around risk to be had but you attacking someone’s 30second paragraph about their anecdote does not open the door.

[Ucalegon]

[flagged]

[infecto]

Sorry we hit a sore spot and I am sorry that I started the conversation poorly but I hope you also gain some self awareness that some of it was in how rude you yourself are.

Not sure by you keep thinking I have anything to prove to you. My point stands. The governance and risk are very valuable discussion and it’s going to change between industry and the trust level of each group.

Unfortunately most IT is short sighted and trying to play catchup. We had 3 years of thinking about how these tools are going to impact the workplace and are now rushing to catch up while also being insistent that Copilot is a worthwhile alternative. I generally disagree with that. I am not advocating that IT oppressive but that unfortunately most IT leaders are not technical and it shows.