[icen]

Do you remember what it was? This is how I would spell that in BQN, and you could write something very similar in APL (you don't have shift, so you'd have to write 1 drop 0 cat swap instead)

    ((«¬∘∧⊢)' '=⊢)⊸/

This works by building a boolean mask of spaces, and converting it to a mask of 'is a space, preceded by a space', negates that, and replicates out by that inverted mask (i.e. is not a space preceded by a space):

Here's stepping through it with some input.

       (' '=⊢)  "this  is a  sentence with       many   spaces"
    ⟨ 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⟩
       («' '=⊢)  "this  is a  sentence with       many   spaces"
    ⟨ 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⟩
       ((«∧⊢)' '=⊢)  "this  is a  sentence with       many   spaces"
    ⟨ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⟩
       ((«¬∘∧⊢)' '=⊢)  "this  is a  sentence with       many   spaces"
    ⟨ 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ⟩
       ((«¬∘∧⊢)' '=⊢)⊸/  "this  is a  sentence with       many   spaces"
    "this is a sentence with many spaces"

[dzaima]

Some alternative spellings:

    (¬∘∧⟜«' '=⊢)⊸/
    (¬·«⊸∧' '=⊢)⊸/
    {¬«⊸∧' '=x}⊸/ # should have double-struck x here (U+1D569), but hn removes it

[icen]

There's also the much less vector oriented spelling:

    (1 ∾˜ "  "⊸(¬∘⍷))⊸/

which removes the first space of each occurrence of double spacing

[xelxebar]

With an OR 2-scan, you can avoid the negation. Here's how I'd do it in APL: {⍵⌿⍨2∨⌿0⍪' '≠⍵}. In general, I find that boolean 2-scans pop up quite a bit in real-world APL usage. It's worth working through them. I have a short article [0] on the subject, if you're interested.

It's also worth thinking through how all 16 boolean operators work on boolean masks. E.g. what do msk≠msk2, msk<msk2, msk≤msk2 etc. mean? In my experience, the important part is to find crisp domain-specific meanings for these patterns. In general, really, that's how you gain APL fluency. In the same way that reading fluency requires chunking so that letters "disappear", APL fluency requires familiarity with semantic phrases, so you stop thinking in the individual symbols.

[0]:https://blog.wilsonb.com/posts/2023-07-24-suggestivity-and-i...

[kcroarkin]

(crossing fingers I one shot formatting correctly) I use 2-wise for figuring out which water surfaces to draw: ⍉l⊤⍸∊(chunk=¯1)(2>⌿⍤2⍪⍤2)⊢0⍴⍨⊃l

- ⍪⍤2 add padding on top of surface of bit mask of water

- 2>⌿⍤2 identify where surface is exposed by seeing if air comes after water vertically

- ⍉l⊤⍸∊ collapse and get where water is in chunk position format row-by-row

[tosh]

in k:

  s:"this  is a  sentence with       many   spaces"
  
  s@&~0&':s=" "

[pillmillipedes]

s@&~&':^s would be a bit shorter. is-null(^) also works on spaces