|
|
|
|
|
by ShinyLeftPad
38 days ago
|
|
This is a fallacious argument. As if it was controversial to say that an organization engaging in lawless violence and terror attacks (imagine if those attacks were against you) doesn't have any moral ground to stand on, even if it does some other things besides that. It's basically the mafia approach. They are known to help people and stuff sometimes, does it mean we should condone them and protest when they are targeted? The key people in mafia are also always in "administrative" roles. If you only target the guy pulling the trigger, you would be a fool since he is pretty low among the pawns. |
|