[dxdm]

I think it shows that art and how people relate to it is more complicated than you think. If the existence of a bunch of handpicked comments can lead you to your conclusion, then you will struggle to find any "good" art at all. Which may be an entirely coherent interpretation of the state of things; just not a very interesting one.

[engeljohnb]

It's a good thing then that I'm not concerned about how interesting my perspective is to you.

[dxdm]

Of course. Sorry. Not your perspective, but the conclusion, if you leave it there. Which you well may.

[engeljohnb]

Okay, didn't mean to come out swinging, just a habit on internet forums anymore I guess.

To try to discuss more productively: I already thought Monet was overrated, and this was a long-held and considered opinion, not just a knee-jerk reaction to this post.

The post seemed to serve as a pepsi-challenge that confirmed what I already thought, but you're right that it's all cherrypicked anyway. That's the part I didn't consider so carefully.

[dxdm]

That's fair. I on the other hand thought I was reading a dismissal based on nothing but some tweets (of all things), but in the end that was just an assumption I made.

I notice that were doing this underneath these words:

> Hopefully it helps people to at least be more conscious of their bias.

Oh, well. Is this how it feels when it's working?