[boomboomsubban]

As I found the article did a poor job of demonstrating what a swift brick is, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swift_brick

[cassianoleal]

I opened the article without a clue about what they were. Within my first 5-10 s on it I knew what they were.

Literally right below the title:

> bricks that provide nesting for swifts and other endangered birds

And a picture.

[IshKebab]

It has two very clear pictures at the top...?

[boomboomsubban]

There's a picture of a box with a bunch of playing cards on top of it, then a picture of a building that has one. I found it insufficient and thought others might too.

[mynameisvlad]

There's a picture of the brick, you mean.

[boomboomsubban]

That was not clear to me. Dunno why people are making such a big deal out of "if you want more info, go here."

[stavros]

I agree with you, I immediately understood what they are, but what's the problem with more clarification? I've upvoted you.

[pdpi]

Offering clarification is good, shitting on the article is bad.

The article does, in fact, do a perfectly fine job of explaining what a swift brick is. GP could easily have said “I couldn’t quite picture what a swift brick is”, but instead said “article did a poor job explaining swift bricks”, and that’s what they’re getting criticised for.