| And you are right that is possible. But the question is not, 'can you build a data-center in space', but rather is it cheaper to build it in space? A data-center no matter where has 100'000s of connections, each connection is a failure point. And things that go on rockets that shake to an insane degree need to have lots of special attention paid to each such connection. Heating again is 10-100x more difficult in space, again, it could be solved, but again, is it cheaper. Same for transport, transporting stuff into space is 10-100x more expensive. Same for lifecycle management, 10-100x more expensive in space. You need fuel and move around avoiding collisions and so on. Same for mechanical complexity overall, a standard server rack on earth is complex (see Oxide) a 'space server rack' is likely 10x100x more complex. So basically you have to re-engineer literally everything from the ground up for a new environment. So the question is what is the argument for why you should bare this cost. The only argument seem to be constant sunlight, and maybe regulatory. Regulatory is not looking like it will be much easier in space, launch alone is a huge regulatory burden. So really we are comparing setting up enough batteries to survive for a night or getting another constant source of power with all the cost mentioned above. I know what side I would be on. > active rerouting around dead cores That still means you have a dead core in your system. All you are saying is 'lets pay even more to launch extra capacity in case part of it fails'. And that goes for every part from the smallest core all the way up to the largest subsystems on the sat. Or you can just order a replacement when you actually need it, like when you have a data-center on earth. |