|
|
|
|
|
by Tloewald
4953 days ago
|
|
IANAl but putting up a website implies granting certain kinds of access. This is common knowledge and common practice. The foundation of Common Law (the basis of our legal system) is "what would a reasonable man do?" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_person You can't parse sentences out of context and apply programmer logic to them, that's not how laws work. |
|
It's true that Judge Kozinski in the 9th Circuit said he would not "apply a badly drafted piece of legislation to lead to [an] absurd result."
But the issue is not cut and dry.
Kozinski essentially acknowledged he was interpreting the statute in a manner possibly at odds with its very language. These courts get reversed all the time (over 70% of their cases) - and other circuits have read the law more narrowly.
And the government itself supports a narrow reading of the law.
OP's article is over the top. My point is, the "authorization" part of the law appears extremely broad and as the DOJ puts it: "the case law on this issue is muddy."