|
|
|
|
|
|
by SigmundA
39 days ago
|
|
|
>The CMRR of the Micsig I linked is pretty average, but it's a lot better than the TiePie at low frequencies. Micsig also specifies it at multiple points across the spectrum, while TiePie doesn't even say where they measured it. It worse at high frequencies and the same in the middle. Again this is a whole scope compared to a probe. Not sure why you think Tiepies are toys, they are use professionally in Europe, popular for automotive. They have a lot more expensive scopes, and the price difference for the differential versions are not that much. |
|
|