Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kstrauser 32 days ago
Last I looked, Forgejo had more activity and more contributors than Gitea. Also, Forgejo eats its own dogfood: Codeberg runs on it, and hosts it, while Gitea runs on GitHub.

It’s easy to make the case that Forgejo is good enough for public hosting. Gitea probably is, too, but there’s less direct evidence.

1 comments

gitea runs on github u mean the source or the hosting?
Gitea uses GitHub to host the Gitea source code.

In contrast, Forgejo hosts its code on Codeberg, and Codeberg is running the Forgejo software.

Dont see a problem with hosting gitea on github and codeberg I dislike for numerous reasons.