[motohagiography]

The King is the head of state, it's trivial to switch that to a US appointee. It's the highest likelihood on the list of alternatives to accepting a surveillance state. Canadians don't have the anything for a civil war, nobody who believes in anything will take MAID, Alberta secession has to go through imported "votes" and a process designed to sabotage it.

If Canada had any kind of national identity it would not have become what was recently described as a "south asian country controlled by China," in a conversation about its relationship to US national security. Outside faculty clubs pickle ball courts, and maybe dog daycare pickup runs, there is zero resistance to annexation. It would be the only time the US would ever be "greeted as liberators."

[LocalH]

The US is tripping over itself to enact a surveillance state with the assistance of big tech corporations. Becoming a US territory would not, in any way, prevent a surveillance state from taking over.

[vkou]

If you think that Canada can be described as a Chinese puppet by serious people, I'm not sure I can take any of the rest seriously. I'd suggest that you stop listening to MAGA propaganda in the particular, and anglonews in the general.

[motohagiography]

These serious people you know, do they read primary sources?

- PRC police stations in Canada: https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/trnsprnc/brfng-mtrls/prlm...

- Foreign interference in elections: https://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=abo&dir=comp/m...

You have no serious people.