|
|
|
|
|
|
by jasonfarnon
30 days ago
|
|
|
This seems like a nice compromise. The news orgs get to keep the initial flurry of page views while the free information/universal library role of the Internet is maintained. But still those magazines will want to control their back catalogues. They currently sell access to libraries/universities. And as many on HN suggest, some of those news orgs would like to change/update stories without a publicly available "revision history". |
|
|
Solution would be to restrict LLMs from training on the archives. Libraries and universities paying for back access is more complicated.